Why Today’s ‘Ghost Newsrooms’ Don’t Have Many (Or Any) Local Reporters

Not too long ago, we brought you a story about how local newspapers are dying at an alarming rate. But even in communities that still technically have a dedicated news source, there might not be much going on in the newsroom.

The rise of “ghost newsrooms”

For better or worse, technology is at the heart of this trend.

For starters, it’s easier than ever to get information from social media and other sources. Then there’s the decline of revenue caused by the switch from print ads to less expensive digital ones.

It all adds up to serious staffing cuts that have left some newspapers limping along without an actual newsroom or any local staff reporters. The Gleaner, which once served Henderson, Kentucky, with a staff of about 20 employees, is a prime example.

The Gleaner now relies on content provided by Gannett, the national company that owns it, or the work of freelancers. Despite the fact that its physical newsroom has been closed for years, the newspaper is still published five days a week.

But all those cuts have clearly come at a cost.

Communities are being deprived

Aside from the toll that ghost newsrooms have taken on the careers of reporters and editors who once covered local events full-time, experts say there are several ways that everyone in towns like Henderson are paying the price.

• Communication: A fully staffed newsroom can provide feedback and analysis to locals who need additional information.
• Accountability: It is far more difficult for ghost newsrooms to serve as watchdogs for local governments, businesses, and organizations.
• Expertise: With freelancers forced to cover a variety of beats, there’s no room for content specialization.

Some innovative digital outlets are popping up to address these issues, but the broader problem doesn’t seem to be going away.

Chris Agee November 25th, 2023

Share this story: